Billy Bush Critiques A.I. For Ranking Him Low Among the Bush Family
Published: April 16, 2025, 7:21 AM PDT
Television personality Billy Bush has publicly expressed his disappointment in artificial intelligence after learning that it did not consider him a prominent member of the Bush family legacy. In a recent interaction, Bush referred to the technology as “crap,” particularly after it failed to rank him higher than 11th among his relatives in a list of the family’s most successful members.
While AI systems are increasingly utilized for various applications, they are not without flaws. In entertainment and celebrity culture, where perception significantly influences reputation, the accuracy of such ranking systems can have unexpected implications. A notorious public figure and member of the Bush political dynasty, Billy Bush clearly felt the weight of the inadequacies of AI when it came to assessing personal success and familial legacy.
In an interview, Bush shared his thoughts about the AI-generated list, which included prominent figures such as his uncles, former U.S. Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, who naturally occupied the top positions. While he humbly placed himself at 11th, he expressed that AI’s estimation of his worth within the family was unfair, particularly when it came to some relatives who ranked higher.
Throughout their family history, each member has contributed to both political and charitable efforts on different scales. Bush’s cousin, George P. Bush, served as the land commissioner of Texas from 2015 to 2023, and his brother, Jonathan S. Bush, was a co-founder of Athenahealth, a successful healthcare technology company, suggesting that the variety of contributions across the family is both extensive and nuanced. Bush criticized the AI for undervaluing the impact of his work in television and entertainment, which, while not directly political, has profoundly influenced popular culture.
In a light-hearted jab at the A.I.’s ranking, Bush brought up the topic of his grandmother receiving 10th place, further highlighting the subjective nature of success within their esteemed family line. These interactions underline not only a humorous take on AI’s limitations but also the complexities associated with family legacy dynamics and how they can be interpreted.
While artificial intelligence continues to evolve, Billy Bush’s critique serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between machine learning and the subjective assessments of human contributions—elements that data alone cannot fully encapsulate. The conversation around AI’s role in evaluating personal merit opens up broader discussions about its functionality and the inherent biases within existing algorithms.
